By Mitchel Wilson
In Singer v. Ferro, 35 IER Cases 614 (2013), the court affirmed summary judgment for the defendants and dismissed Singer’s first amendment retaliation claim. Singer had alleged retaliation in the form of baseless disciplinary actions and wrongful termination.
By David E. Worley
In Jackson County Sheriff’s Dep’t, 131 LA 433 (Pratte, 2013), a non-disciplinary transfer was upheld when a Sergeant who had been in the same unit for 21 years was transferred by the Sheriff and there was no change in seniority or rate of pay. Noting that this grievance involved a nondisciplinary transfer, the Arbitrator found that the Union had the burden to prove the transfer violated a specific provision in the CBA. The arbitrator held that there was no clear exception to the management rights clause in the CBA, and the restrictive language cited by the union did not apply.
By Jim Cline
We are following other Labor and Employment Law Blogs on the Web and will bring to your attention some other articles worth reading. Here are some other articles we think are worth a look: [Read more…]
By Kate Acheson and Jim Cline
In Cain v. Montgomery County, the Federal Court in Tennessee dismissed the discrimination and retaliation claims of a lieutenant Emergency Medical Technician (“EMT”) who was demoted for passing gas loudly. A Montgomery County Emergency Medical Services employee, Rita Cain, was hired on as an EMT in 1992 and was later promoted her to the supervisory position of lieutenant EMT in 1996. On March 29, 2010, Cain was present during an EMT’s call to dispatch about a patient’s transport. During that incident, Cain was upset that dispatch had not notified EMS of the transport and stated: “You all don’t tell me shit.” Then, Cain passed gas loudly enough for the dispatcher to hear over the telephone. When the dispatcher complained, Cain dismissed her flatulence as a joke.
By Jim Cline and Mitchel Riese
A recent news story that garnered national attention concerned the discipline of a Social Security employee by the Social Security Administration, who reprimanded the employee for excessive workplace flatulence. The reprimand was delivered to the employee in a five-page letter that included a log of representative dates and times when the employee was recorded, “releasing the awful and unpleasant odor” in his Baltimore office. After the employee filed a grievance over the reprimand, the Social Security Administration withdrew it.
