January 18, 2013

A More than One-Year Delay Makes Discipline Untimely and Improper Regardless of Just Cause

By David Worley

Gavel
In Federal Bureau of Prisons (130 LA 1745 (Szuter, 2012), a one-day suspension was overturned entirely based on the lengthy delay that elapsed between the time of the infraction and the time of the discipline. While the arbitrator concluded that just cause existed to discipline the employee for the infraction, he also concluded that the contract was violated by the 15 month delay in completing the investigation.

Filed Under: ,

January 18, 2013

Police Sergeant CBA “Rank Differential” Requires Inclusion of Patrol Officer Signing Bonus in Differential Calculation

By David Worley

Signing Bonus
An arbitrator in City of Canton, ruled that Canton Police Sergeants are entitled to have the Patrol Officer’s signing bonus included in the equation when calculating the Sergeant’s contractually, guaranteed rank differential agreement

Filed Under:

January 11, 2013

How Voluntary is a Resignation While Under Investigation? Georgia Federal Court Finds Investigator’s Threat, Pre-Written Resignation Letter Potentially Coercive

By Kate Acheson

signature
In Rogers v. Georgia Dep't of Corr., a federal district court in Georgia considered whether an internal investigator’s threat of termination and presentation of a pre-written resignation letter is sufficient to show that a resignation was coerced. The court found that, although the knowledge of impending discipline alone is not enough to make a resignation involuntary, the threat and pre-written letter was enough evidence to possibly persuade a jury that the employee’s termination was not voluntary.

Filed Under: , ,

November 8, 2012

Just Cause Termination for Poor Judgment Requires Clear Policies, Guidance

By Kate Acheson

Vehicle Pursuit
In Cincinnati State, 130 LA 1205 (Heekin, 2012), a Campus Police Officer was terminated for “very poor judgment” after pursuing a reckless driver on campus, while driving her own private, unmarked vehicle. The Officer disputed the termination, claiming no just cause existed. The arbitrator agreed and directed the Officer’s immediate reinstatement with back pay, seniority, and benefits.

Filed Under: ,

November 7, 2012

Arbitrator Overturns Officer’s Termination for Taking a Female Victim to his Home: “Extremely Poor Judgment” Mitigated by Other Factors

By Kate Acheson

Termination of Employment
In City of Tulsa, 130 LA 1163 (Williams, 2012), the Tulsa Police Department terminated an officer for bringing a domestic violence victim to his home. The Arbitrator agreed with the Union’s argument, that the termination was too harsh, based on other Department discipline measures and the officer’s good record.

Filed Under:

November 1, 2012

Portland’s Calculated Attempt to Avoid Implementation of Arbitration Award Thwarted by Employment Relations Board

By Kate Acheson

Arbitration
The Employment Relations Board of the State of Oregon (“ERB”) found in UP-023-12 that the City of Portland violated state law by refusing to implement Arbitrator Wilkenson’s award reinstating Officer Ronald Frashour. The ERB ordered the City to comply with the arbitrator’s award and to post notices of its violation due to its “calculated” avoidance.

Filed Under:

November 1, 2012

You Don’t Get what You Don’t Ask For: Arbitrator Unable to Award Unrequested Relief in CBA Violation

By Kate Acheson

Contract
In Central State University, 130 LA 1351 (Bell, 2012), Arbitrator Langdon Bell was precluded from awarding monetary damages against Central State University for a violation of their collective-bargaining agreement (“CBA”) with their security officers because the union did file a written request for a specific remedy. Thus, although a violation with associated monetary damages was properly alleged, the Arbitrator could only direct the University to adhere to the CBA staffing guidelines in the future.

Filed Under: , ,

September 27, 2012

Despite Managerial Prerogative Provision in City Charter, Colorado Appeals Court Finds Disciplinary System to be a Mandatory Subject of Bargaining

By Kate Acheson

Fire Fighter
The City of Denver was recently thwarted in its attempt to unilaterally implement a new disciplinary system on firefighters. In Denver Fire Fighters, Local 858 v. City & County of Denver, the Colorado Court of Appeals upheld the firefighters union’s claims that a “discipline matrix” - which defined penalties for rule violations - is a mandatory subject of bargaining.

Filed Under: ,

September 25, 2012

Iowa Corrections Department Properly Terminated Apathetic Employee, Arbitrator Finds

By Kate Acheson

Clip Board
An arbitrator in State of Iowa, 130 LA 1130 (2012, Jacobs) found the Iowa Department of Corrections has just cause to terminate an Iowa State corrections counselor for failing to do enough interviews with inmates.

Filed Under:

September 24, 2012

Arbitrator Rules Employer was Justified in Issuing a Letter of Reprimand and Suspending an Officer Who Failed to File a Use of Force Report

By Rick Gautschi

Police Use of Force
In City of Tulsa, 130 LA 1039 (Arb. 2012), a police officer responded to an incident involving an intoxicated person in a parking lot on the Tulsa campus of Oklahoma State University. During the ensuing incident, the officer handcuffed the intoxicated person, and because he was not cooperating, the officer dragged him to a police vehicle. At some point, prior to being placed in the vehicle, the intoxicated person fell and hit either the concrete, or a bumper on the police vehicle.

Filed Under:

Blog Search

Blog Categories

Blog Authors

Jim received his B.A. with distinction in Political Science. [More…]

Sam received his B.A in Political Science and M.A in International Political Economy. [More…]

Amy received her B.A. in Integrative Physiology. [More…]