September 12, 2016

Arbitrator Rules That Michigan Fire Department’s New Social Media Policy Is Vague, But Reasonable, However “Snitch” Provision Is Held to Be Unreasonable.

By Jim Cline and Geoff Kiernan

social-media
In the City of Bay City, a arbitrator ruled that Michigan Fire Department’s unilateral implementation of a new social media policy for firefighters was appropriate under the management rights clause as it was within managements purview to give employees guidance on their conduct. However, the arbitrator did find the provision which required firefighters to report violations of the policy or else face discipline as being unreasonable and therefore unenforceable.

Filed Under:

September 12, 2016

Arbitrator Overturns Discipline, Finding That Ohio County Jail Cannot Require Corrections Officers To Refrain From Defending Themselves

By Jim Cline and Geoff Kiernan

burden
In Cuyahoga County Court, an arbitrator ruled that County did not meet its burden of proving just cause when it fired a detention officer for insubordination and excessive force. The arbitrator found that it was improper to fire the officer for insubordination because he did not explicitly understand the order, and he was not informed of the consequences of failing to follow the order. The arbitrator also ruled the court did not have just cause to discharge the officer for excessive force when he was only defending himself.

Filed Under: ,

September 9, 2016

Arbitrator Rules That Absent A Contract Provision Minnesota Police Department Can Determine How To Classify Training Hours

By Jim Cline and Geoff Kiernan

calendar
In the City of Forest Lake, an arbitrator ruled that a Minnesota city did not violate its collective bargaining agreement when it required Officers who attended training on their days of to “flex” their work hours to limit overtime. Despite the fact that the Union tried to official repudiate the practice in bargaining the arbitrator found that this policy was not something that union was able to repudiate.

Filed Under:

August 31, 2016

Court Holds Alabama Fire Chief Who Raised Possibility of Discriminatory Motivation Covered by ADA Despite Direct Violations of Work Rules

By Mitchell Riese and Mathias M. Deeg

fire-putter-out-e1472680772449
In Green v. Pike Rd. Volunteer Fire Protection Authority, the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Alabama upheld a Fire Chief’s claim of disability discrimination despite the existence of non-discriminatory reasons for his termination. The Court found that the employer’s comments about the Fire Chief’s past drug and alcohol use cast enough doubt on the stated motivation for his termination to send the case to trial.

Filed Under:

August 31, 2016

Illinois Police Commander Unable to Perform the Essential Functions of Job Cannot Sue for Disability Discrimination

By Mitchell Riese and Mathias M. Deeg

back-injury-1-e1472681024128
In Briscoe v. Village of Vernon Hills, the U.S. district Court for the Northern District of Illinois held that that a former Police Commander that was unable to perform the essential functions of his job with or without reasonable accommodation by Vernon Hills could not prevail on a claim of disability discrimination. The court found that the Commander’s inability to work removed him from the protection of the ADA.

Filed Under:

August 29, 2016

Arbitrator Finds No Just Cause For Disciplining Seattle Dispatcher Over Call, But Upholds Discipline Anyway based on Separate Charge

By Jim Cline and Sarah E. Derry

911_Telecommunications_Dispatcher
In Seattle Police Dispatchers’ Guild, Arbitrator Jeff Minckler determined that although the Seattle police department lacked just cause to discipline a dispatcher for a call, the other call over which he was disciplined was sufficient to uphold the punishment.

Filed Under: ,

August 19, 2016

No Discipline For Port Orchard Detective Who Mishandled Evidence When His Mistake Did Not Cause The City’s Seven Year Delay In Case Investigation

By Jim Cline and Sarah E. Derry

mdicaal
In Port Orchard Police Guild, Arbitrator James Lundberg found that a detective, who received a written reprimand for mishandling a cheek swab seven years before, was disciplined without just cause. The Arbitrator reasoned it was an old mistake, and that disciplining him now “serves no reasonable purpose.”

Filed Under: ,

August 19, 2016

Arbitrator Finds That Chelan County Did Not Have Just Cause To Terminate A 19-Year Veteran Sergeant And That It’s Investigation Was “Neither Thorough Nor Was It Unbiased”

By Jim Cline and Jordan Jones

seargent
In Chelan County, Arbitrator James A. Lundberg found that Chelan County did not have just cause to terminate a 19-year veteran Sergeant and ordered that he be reinstated with back pay as part of the decision’s “make whole” remedy. In a case handled by the Cline and Casillas firm, Lundberg rejected the County’s argument that Sergeant had “lied,” noting that the County overlooked many holes in its case.

Filed Under: ,

July 13, 2016

Representing the Injured or Disabled Member Part 3: The General Duty to Accommodate a Disability

By Jim Cline and Erica Shelley Nelson

disabled
This article is the 3rd in a multiple part series covering the rights your injured and disabled members have and how you, as a union or guild representative, can best assist them. Over the next two to three months, we’ll be publishing, in various segments, information on how state and federal laws protect your members who are hurt or otherwise unable to work. We’ll cover topics including disability discrimination law, the FMLA, job protection rights under the CBA, workers compensation, disability benefits, and the right to bring a civil lawsuit.

Filed Under:

July 13, 2016

Virginia District Court Finds FBI Special Agents Were Not Discriminated Against After Being Called “Princesses” and “Prima Donnas”

By Sarah Burke and Mitchell Riese

tiara
In Cowley v. Lynch, four FBI special agents alleged that the FBI had created a hostile work environment, discriminated against them based on their sex in denying them transfers, and had retaliated against them by reorganizing their department in order to break up their “clique.” The FBI argued that the restructuring and transfer denials were due to legitimate department needs and that a hostile work environment had not been established. The district court agreed with the FBI, finding that stray comments made around the agents did not rise to the level of hostile work environment and that the reasons for the restructuring and transfer were legitimate.

Filed Under: ,

Blog Search

Blog Categories

Blog Authors

Jim received his B.A. with distinction in Political Science. [More…]

Sam received his B.A in Political Science and M.A in International Political Economy. [More…]

Amy received her B.A. in Integrative Physiology. [More…]