February 21, 2014

Police Officer Denied Tuition Reimbursement Due to City’s Budgetary Constraints

By Jordan Jones

Denied
In City of Troy, the arbitrator rejected a grievance over the City’s denial of a police officer’s tuition reimbursement request due to the City’s budgetary constraints.

Filed Under: ,

February 13, 2014

Pennsylvania District Court Finds Chief’s Badmouthing and Sharing of Officer’s Personal Medical Information Does Not Qualify As Unlawful Retaliation for Officer’s Disability Accommodation Request

By Emily Nelson

Case Dismissed 4
Plaintiff Leif Henry, a police officer for the City of Allentown, Pennsylvania, filed suit against the City alleging, among other things, disability discrimination and retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act after a superior officer complained about Henry’s request for a medical accommodation, and Henry was then subjected to an internal affairs investigation. The district court dismissed both claims in Henry v. City of Allentown, finding that Henry had not shown that he suffered an “adverse employment action” by his superior officer, Chief Roger MacLean.

Filed Under: ,

February 12, 2014

City of Chicago has Discretion in Assigning Mandatory Overtime for Police Officers

By Jordan Jones

Overtime 2
In City of Chicago, the arbitrator, citing “management rights” denied police officers’ grievance for not being assigned overtime for “Operation Safe Summer.”

Filed Under: ,

December 11, 2013

Invoking Public Safety Employer Exemption in ADEA, City of Cleveland Permissibly Forces Police Officers Aged 65+ into Retirement during Budget Crisis

By Mitchel Wilson

Retirement 1
In Sadie v. City of Cleveland, 118 FEP Cases 1104 (6th Cir. 2013), the appellate court upheld the lower court for dismissing the suit of a group of former Cleveland police officers who were not retained after age 65. Their suit alleged that the City’s mandatory retirement program violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), an Ohio discrimination statute, and equal protection of the 14th Amendment.

Filed Under: , ,

December 11, 2013

Florida Mass Drug Testing Arbitration Result Appears to Turn on its Facts and CBA Language

By Jim Cline

Commentary
Occasionally, an arbitration decision calls out for a bit more explanation and the Arbitrator’s Ruling allowing the Ocala Fire Department to “Mass Test” its Firefighters is one such decision. As described in our recent case note on the decision, the arbitrator found that the reasonable suspicion language in the CBA allowed the City to undertake a “mass test” all firefighters with any type of access to fire trucks from which narcotics had gone missing.

Filed Under: , ,

December 11, 2013

Florida Fire Department that Ordered Mass Drug Testing Over Missing Morphine Does Not Violated the CBA, Arbitrator Rules

By Anthony Rice

Drug Test  3
In the City of Ocala, an arbitrator found that the City did not violate the CBA when it urine tested 19 firefighters who had access to two fire trucks from which narcotics went missing.

Filed Under: ,

December 9, 2013

Suspension Reduced for Chicago Officer Who Attempted to Help His Friend—a Bombing Suspect

By Anthony Rice

Justice Scales
In City of Chicago, the arbitrator reduced the Grievant’s suspension from 20 days to 10 days for a Chicago officer charged with interference in the execution of search warrant during an investigation of a car bombing by a suburban Police Department in which the Officer’s friend was a suspect. The arbitrator ordered the reduction after he concluded that the Officer did not interfere with the execution of a search warrant, but did agree that the Officer had been verbally abusive to the investigating officers.

Filed Under: ,

December 9, 2013

New Jersey Dispatch Center Manager with Leukemia Who Claims Retaliation after Seeking Accommodation from “Moldy Room” Presents Viable Discrimination and FMLA Claims

Retaliation Green Road Sign on Dramatic Blue Sky with Clouds.
In Moore v. County of Camden, 20 WH Cases 2d 1369 (D.N.J. 2013), a New Jersey federal district ruled declined to dismiss and set for trial a Dispatch Managers Claim that he was retaliated against after he presented his health issues.

Filed Under: , ,

December 6, 2013

Ninth Circuit Holds that Crimes Committed as Soldier are Not Protected “Performance of Service” Under the USERRA

By Mitchel Wilson

Gavel'
In an unpublished decision Nazario v. City of Riverside, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s decision to dismiss a discharged Riverside PD officer’s Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”) claims, denying him a trial, because he could not show he was fired and not rehired because of his military service.

Filed Under: , , ,

December 4, 2013

Air Force Firefighting Contractor Fails Arbitration Test Because of Its Inconsistent and Disparate Application of Pulmonary Capacity Tests on Assistant Chief

By Anthony Rice

Fail
In CSC Applied Technologies, the arbitrator sustained the grievance finding that Management overlooked mitigating factors when it terminated an assistant fire chief from service on the grounds that he failed to meet medical requirements.

Filed Under: ,

Blog Search

Blog Categories

Blog Authors

Jim received his B.A. with distinction in Political Science. [More…]

Sam received his B.A in Political Science and M.A in International Political Economy. [More…]

Amy received her B.A. in Integrative Physiology. [More…]