August 28, 2013
By Anthony Rice
In Pubentz, an FBI linguist’s First Amendment retaliation claim failed because the linguist’s comments, made during a work presentation at the Chicago FBI Office, were not made as a citizen on a matter of public concern. Moreover, even if the speech was made as a citizen and on a matter of public concern, the court held the government’s interest would outweigh the linguist’s in this scenario.
Filed Under: Constitutional Rights, Free Speech Rights, Legal Rights
August 22, 2013
By Mitchel Wilson
In Hamner v. Ann Arundel Cnty., 117 FEP Cases 1672 (2013), the court permitted the claims of a county employee who had been transferred to the police department against the county for retaliatory failure to hire and a hostile work environment. She had been transferred, but the county claimed to only a provisional position.
Filed Under: Discrimination, Gender/Pregnancy Discrimination
August 20, 2013
By David Worley
In Dooley v. City of Bridgeport, 34 IER Cases 1507 (S.D. Ill. 2013), the court denied motions to dismiss the due process claims of Officer Dooley, an Illinois police officer who was terminated following an arrest for illegally selling a firearm. The charge turned out to be baseless, and Dooley challenged his termination on due process grounds and a number of state statutes. The court found that as Dooley had a well defined property interest in his employment and no sufficient inquiry had indicated termination was actually proper, his claims could survive a motion to dismiss.
Filed Under: Discipline, Other Procedure Issues, Prediscipline Procedure
August 20, 2013
By Mitchel Wilson
In Horne v. City of Detroit, 27 AD Cases 1518 (2013), the court dismissed a former Detroit police officer’s ADA claim and granted summary judgment for the City of Detroit. The court concluded that the City lawfully terminated Horne after he plead guilty to four counts stemming from him firing eight rounds from an AR-15 into the home of his wife’s lover.
Filed Under: Disability Discrimination, Discrimination
August 15, 2013
By Mitchel Wilson
In Bennett v. Dallas Independent School District, 3:11-cv-00393-D (2013), the court granted summary judgment to the Dallas Independent School District (“DISD”) and dismissed Bennett’s claims under the ADA and Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”) when Bennett refused to take a psychological exam following a disability related reassignment, and then stopped showing up for work entirely without providing any notice.
Filed Under: Disability Discrimination, Discrimination, USERRA
August 13, 2013
By Mitchel Wilson
In Landolfini v. City of Melburn, (2013), the court granted the defendant City summary judgment and dismissed Dominick Landolfi’s claim for discrimination under the USERRA. Landolfini alleged that the City failed to promote him because he is a reservist in the air force and that he might be called away to serve. But the court concluded that his misconduct is what led to his promotion difficulties.
Filed Under: Discrimination, USERRA
August 9, 2013
By Mitchel Wilson
The District Court in Crowell v. Denver Health, (2013) allowed a discharged Colorado paramedic dispatcher’s FMLA and ADA claims to go to trial on cross motions but dismissed her claim for retaliation when the employees’ absences place her in violation of the employer’s “Excessive Absenteeism” policy.
Filed Under: Disability Discrimination, Discrimination
August 7, 2013
By Mitchel Wilson
In Maresca v. City of New York, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the enforcement of NYFD’s zero-tolerance policy for drugs was not a pretext to discharge New York Firefighter Maresca because of his post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”). The 2nd Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the City when Maresca tested positive for cocaine and he was fired soon after and solely because of the test results. Even though Maresca established the prima facie case because he was a sufferer of PTSD, his employer knew he had PTSD, and he was fired, the court found that the employer successfully rebutted the argument.
Filed Under: Disability Discrimination, Discrimination, Legal Rights
August 5, 2013
By Mitchel Wilson
In Mocic v. Sumner County Emergency Medical Service, 117 FEP Cases 1005 (M.D. Tenn. 2013), a Federal District Court dismissed two of a discharged Tennessee paramedic’s claims, but allowed her claims for sexual harassment and retaliation to proceed to trial. Both of her Title VII claims fail because there wasn’t any actual harm suffered just the appearance of harm. Leading up to her discharge her employer and supervisor taunted her daily, would kick her chair, and tease her about her poorly fitting uniform as her pregnancy progressed. Ultimately she filed a complaint with the EEOC and was fired soon after; her employer asserts that she was discharged because of her inability to lift overweight patients after a shoulder injury.
Filed Under: Discrimination, Gender/Pregnancy Discrimination
August 5, 2013
By Anthony Rice
In City of Bartlesville, the arbitrator found there was just cause to terminate an Oklahoma City police sergeant for not properly controlling officers who engaged in excessive force. The arbitrator applied the 7 tests for finding just cause and found the sergeant’s actions showed a lack of proper supervision of the officers under his watch command.
