In Benavides v. Oklahoma City, 20 WH Cases 2d 331 (10th Cir. 2013), the Court upheld summary judgment on ADA and FMLA claims by a former detective when there was no retaliatory action, the employer suitably responded to alleged harassment, the paid administrative leave was standard for an employee being investigated for a crime, the paid leave did not adversely affect the plaintiff, and there was no showing that the City’s reason was pretextual. The court had little trouble in affirming the lower court’s granting of summary judgment as the plaintiff had utterly failed in indicating any violation of either the ADA or FMLA had occurred.
In Pubentz, an FBI linguist’s First Amendment retaliation claim failed because the linguist’s comments, made during a work presentation at the Chicago FBI Office, were not made as a citizen on a matter of public concern. Moreover, even if the speech was made as a citizen and on a matter of public concern, the court held the government’s interest would outweigh the linguist’s in this scenario.
In Hamner v. Ann Arundel Cnty., 117 FEP Cases 1672 (2013), the court permitted the claims of a county employee who had been transferred to the police department against the county for retaliatory failure to hire and a hostile work environment. She had been transferred, but the county claimed to only a provisional position.
In Horne v. City of Detroit, 27 AD Cases 1518 (2013), the court dismissed a former Detroit police officer’s ADA claim and granted summary judgment for the City of Detroit. The court concluded that the City lawfully terminated Horne after he plead guilty to four counts stemming from him firing eight rounds from an AR-15 into the home of his wife’s lover.
In Bennett v. Dallas Independent School District, 3:11-cv-00393-D (2013), the court granted summary judgment to the Dallas Independent School District (“DISD”) and dismissed Bennett’s claims under the ADA and Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”) when Bennett refused to take a psychological exam following a disability related reassignment, and then stopped showing up for work entirely without providing any notice.
In Landolfini v. City of Melburn, (2013), the court granted the defendant City summary judgment and dismissed Dominick Landolfi’s claim for discrimination under the USERRA. Landolfini alleged that the City failed to promote him because he is a reservist in the air force and that he might be called away to serve. But the court concluded that his misconduct is what led to his promotion difficulties.
The District Court in Crowell v. Denver Health, (2013) allowed a discharged Colorado paramedic dispatcher’s FMLA and ADA claims to go to trial on cross motions but dismissed her claim for retaliation when the employees’ absences place her in violation of the employer’s “Excessive Absenteeism” policy.
In Maresca v. City of New York, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the enforcement of NYFD’s zero-tolerance policy for drugs was not a pretext to discharge New York Firefighter Maresca because of his post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”). The 2nd Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the City when Maresca tested positive for cocaine and he was fired soon after and solely because of the test results. Even though Maresca established the prima facie case because he was a sufferer of PTSD, his employer knew he had PTSD, and he was fired, the court found that the employer successfully rebutted the argument.
In Mocic v. Sumner County Emergency Medical Service, 117 FEP Cases 1005 (M.D. Tenn. 2013), a Federal District Court dismissed two of a discharged Tennessee paramedic’s claims, but allowed her claims for sexual harassment and retaliation to proceed to trial. Both of her Title VII claims fail because there wasn’t any actual harm suffered just the appearance of harm. Leading up to her discharge her employer and supervisor taunted her daily, would kick her chair, and tease her about her poorly fitting uniform as her pregnancy progressed. Ultimately she filed a complaint with the EEOC and was fired soon after; her employer asserts that she was discharged because of her inability to lift overweight patients after a shoulder injury.
In Washington v. Burley, a School District Police Chief’s due process claim survived summary judgment because there was a genuine issue of material fact concerning whether the employer gave him “an opportunity to present his side of the story.” The court held that a reasonable jury could conclude that the employer never allowed the chief to submit a written response or otherwise present his response before being terminated.
